Hyperglance Pricing 2026: Self-Hosted FinOps at Resource-Count Pricing

Hyperglance is the only self-hosted, resource-count-priced platform in this comparison. It combines FinOps with cloud inventory, architecture mapping, governance and automation across AWS, Azure, GCP and Kubernetes, and it bills on the number of resources it ingests rather than a percentage of your cloud spend.

Verified from public sourcesAugust 2026·what verification means

At a Glance

DeploymentSelf-hosted, agentless
Pricing modelPer resource count (not % of spend)
CloudsAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes
GovernmentAWS GovCloud, Azure Government
CertificationFinOps Certified Platform (Jul 2025)
Free trial14 days, unlimited users

Resource-Count Pricing

A resource is a single cloud object Hyperglance ingests and inventories , an instance, VM, database, load balancer, gateway, bucket, disk or serverless function. Tags and metadata do not count separately. Because the bill tracks resource count, not spend, it decouples from cloud-cost inflation: doubling your bill does not double the tool cost. Prices below are billed annually.

TierPrice
Up to 500 resources$899/mo
Up to 1,000 resources$1,459/mo
Up to 3,000 resources$3,144/mo
Up to 5,000 resources$4,492/mo
5,000+ resourcesCustom quote

Pricing from Hyperglance's public pricing page, verified August 2026. Unlimited users are included on every tier. Available through the AWS, Azure and GCP marketplaces.

Where It Fits

Strong fit

Regulated, government and defense teams, and any organisation that needs its cloud-management data to stay inside its own boundary. Self-hosted plus GovCloud and Azure Government support is rare in this category, where almost every alternative is vendor-hosted SaaS. Also a fit for large, complex multi-cloud estates that want inventory, architecture and cost on one platform.

Less of a fit

Small single-cloud teams happy with native tooling (AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Cost Management), or teams that specifically want a fully managed SaaS with no infrastructure to run. Kubernetes-only cost allocation is better served by a specialist like Kubecost or OpenCost.

On the figures above

Every number here is drawn from Hyperglance's own public pages and re-derivable from them. Hyperglance has been invited to confirm these figures against its canonical sources; once it does, this page will carry a dated "Confirmed with vendor" mark. Verification is free, offered to every vendor on identical terms, and never affects how a tool is described. See our methodology for how this works.

Updated 2026-06-16